Imagethief

I thought they were diverting the Yangzte to Beijing or is this part of a rediversion back south again or part of the project to merge the Huanghe with the Nile? I can't keep track of all this stuff...

A year ago we represented an US company who wanted to enter into the Chinese market in water filter technology. We were told by many municipalities that they have no water problem... Ha ha ha! Maybe we should call them again...

[warning.... this post is off topic and off site as well.

this is in response to the thread "Neocons tried to push for Iraq-style conflict with China...?" from pekin duck. for some reason best known to himself, "i like china" richard always allowed creeps like xxxchuan to spew their craps, but those like me who expose their lies are persona non grata.

WILL AND CHINA HAND , FEEL FREE TO DELETE THIS pOST ]

xxxchuan the china baiter is finally showing his colors. first he quoted a financial times report which claimed that china still covet part of indian land, [the brits?, they SHOULD know why dont they?]

http://www.newint.org/issue256/keynote.htm

now he says that if china get whacked in the tw straits, it will not be able to "enforce its will" at the indian border. [sic]

[how come this guy sounds so much like mr raj, ?]

mr eh, xxxchuan, it was the brits who imposed the "macmahon line" on a weakened china. being seasoned land grabbers that they were, they managed to grab the juicest part of the quarry, they called it the "gem of tibet", a vast land the size of 10 belgiums, endowed with a wealth of precious minerals deposits and awesome hydraulic potential. but india wasnt satisfied with this ill gotten loot, it claimed more land north of the infamous macmahon line.

in 1962, emboldened with the support of BOTH the us and ussr, [you got to hand it to the indians, getting the yanks and the russians, who were at each others neck,to jointly attack china], mounted an aggressive "forward deployment" inside chinese territory.

after the pla routed the intruders, there was nothin between them and delhi, it could have at least recover the territory robbed by the brits, but the pla retreated back to the line of control.

the then under secretary to the British Foreign Office, lord Caccia, commented in 1966 (not without a tinge of grudging admiration) that, "The Chinese withdrawal to their original line after a victory in the field was the first time in recorded history that a great power has not exploited military success by demanding something more" (Maxwell). A magnificent piece of diplomacy by any standard, which sadly was not reciprocated.

right after the border war, the Indian Foreign Secretary expressed the Indian Governments willingness "to work with the United States both politically and militarily in the rest of Asia" for the containment of China.

a cornered china concluded that alliance with pakistan etc was the only way out of this encirclement. many indians, who are perenially pointing to the sino pak connection as proof of chinese belligerance, seem to be confusing cause and effect.

even after china acquire nuclear capacity, it didnt use its military superiority to ENFORCE ITS WILL on the border with india, in fact, its the first nuclear power to declare a no first use nuclear doctrine.

yet right after india's 1998 nuclear test, defence minister george fernandez promptly declared china as no 1 enenmy. indian prez vijapayee even made it a point to write a personal letter to clinton, assuring him of indian friendship and rationalising the indian bomb as deterrence to "chinese aggression".

but ex pentagon senior officer charles freeman, hardly a ccp apologist, offered this observation, "china is content to keep the status quo at the border, its india's internal politics that prevent a real settlement of the border issue."

mr eh, xxxchuan, if china wants to "enforce its will" on the border with india, it could have done it in 1962 and when it acquired nuclear cabability in 1965, but it didnt, so why should it want to do it now --- when india has acquired military parity, may be even superiority, and when india is alliance with us , japan, australia. ?

mr eh, xxxchuan, it was india which tried to ENFORCE iTS WILL on the border in 1962, as they says, the rest is history.

it has always been the case, india enforcing its will on its neighbours --

which led to three wars with pak, border clash with bangladesh in 2003 and 2005. defenceless sikkim was annexed in 1975 and bhutan being turned into a protectorate. nepal is claiming a large chunk of land occupied by india, including kalapani.

but they dont talk about such stuffs in the west, i guess there's some kind of professional courtesy among thiefs.

they all want to liberate the tibetans from china though. [sic]

It's the pollution that causes green algae! Not the other way round.

Massive dumping of agricultural chemicals and 530 billion tonnes of sewage (0ver 30% of which was raw) causes the lake to die. Then comes the blue Algae!

It's very important to know the difference - the govt want syou to believe it is a blue algae problem and therefore natural. It is not. Know the difference and tell everyone the third biggest natural drinking water lake in China is now the biggest toilent in the world!

@denk: that is a nice piece of creative writing... too bad it is all nonsense. But then that is ok, after all, it is just creative writing. I'd given you a grade of A- to B+. Grammer needs work. :)

Will, don't delete. It was fun reading while drinking my morning coffee.

george,

i challenge you to show me where is the bs and i will prove you wrong.

raj and that creep xxxchuan know better, thats why they kept their mouth shut.

i always shut up creeps like xxxchuan wherever i go, coz i alwsy substantiate what i said, no bs.

i will give u a hint though, is sources such as iht good enough for you?

as for my grammer, lol, i have given up mastering it.

"i challenge you to show me where is the bs..."

OK, plenty to choose from; how about this:

"...in fact, its the first nuclear power to declare a no first use nuclear doctrine."

Given that the Chinese government considers lying to be a legitimate strategy for getting what you want, and adheres to the 'all warfare is based on deception' philosophy, I think we can safely call their "no first use nuclear doctrine" utter bs.